Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Facebook မွာစကားေျပာျခင္း (၁၂)
Thanks Ko Tint Swe, I knew that explanations can confuse both sides. What is important is “Trust"
Politics as it is seen is not always it seems to be. We need to have a sense of "WE" to develop a NATION. Many people are intent on getting things done in the way their side wants. To quote one dictum “Everyone wants peace in their own terms. That is a wish. In reality, real life governance, MoUs, treaties, trade agreements are to be honored as bound by international convention. Especially, when it comes to China, President Nixon and National security advisor Henry Kiesinger had learned to deal behind the scene. That approach can achieve better than popular news confrontation or headline events.”
If people continue to say YOU, ME and THEM, instead of WE, this is not good for long term. I knew there are differences in opportunities - it is not just to our country, and with a bit of variation in extent. Change will take time and must wait to see gradually. If not, people might suffer. Some event in history, as those we have witnessed at the time of occurrence, needs time to unfold the real scene and the extent of impact. Let's hope things get better towards a peaceful solution.
Dear my good friend KKA I am glad to read your Philosophy. I have no objection. But allow me to put my two cents!
On ground it is nearly impossible to meet theoretical standard. I also know you quoted real history. My assumption is that Burma case is unique. The so-called change is similar neither to South Africa nor Philippines.
China factor is global. Emotion can’t help. Activist style can’t help out either. We need good brains and reliable partners.
Gradual change in Burma may be written as it happened in the books decades later. But as for now I prefer to quicker change. In every transformation there are people who need to sacrifice. I mean from both sides, those in the power and the sufferers.
Those nonpolitical persons who might have kind heart were silent when unarmed people were brutally and repeatedly killed.
Fortunately both sides are striving for peaceful means. Dhama will help Burma I believe!
Aow Kou Rot: အခု လက္ပန္းေတာင္းမွာ ဒဏ္ရာရတဲ့ လူနာေတြက ေဖာ့စဖာ့းရပ္ ေလာင္ကြ်မ္းမႈ ျဖစ္ႏိုင္လား ဆိုတာပါ။ ေဖာ့စဖားရပ္ ေအာက္ဆီဂ်င္နဲ႔ ဓါတ္ျပဳရင္ အပူခ်ိန္ ၈ဝဝ ဒီဂရီ စင္တီဂရိတ္ေလာက္ ထြက္တယ္လို႔ သိထားရတယ္။ အကယ္၍ အဲဒီ အပူခ်ိန္မွာ ေလာင္ကႊ်မ္း ခံရရင္ လူေတြ ဘယ္လို ျဖစ္ႏိုင္မလဲ။ အဲဒါ ဆရာ ဘယ္လိုသံုးသပ္မိလဲ။
DTS: ဆရာ မီးေလာင္ဒဏ္ရာ စာ ၂ ပုဒ္ေရးတင္ထားပါတယ္။ ဓါတုေလာက္တာ မေရးရေသးပါ။ ေလ့လာမႈ စံုမွ ေရးရတာ ေကာင္းတယ္။ အခုစံုစံုစိစိမေလ့လာရေသးပါ။
Aow Kou Rot: ကြ်န္ေတာ္ စံုစမ္းထားသေလာက္က ေဖာ့စဖါးရပ္ ျဖစ္ႏိုင္ေျခ အေတာ္ နည္းပါတယ္။ ထိုင္းအေျခစိုက္ စစ္ေရးေစာင့္ၾကည့္တဲ့ ဖိုးတ႐ုတ္ကို ေမးတယ္ ျဖစ္ႏိုင္ေျခမ႐ွိလို႔ ဆိုတယ္။ HRW က ဖီးေရာဘတ္ဆန္ကို ေမးတယ္။ သူလည္း မျဖစ္ႏိုင္ဘူးလို႔ ေျပာတယ္။ ျပည္ေထာင္စု သတင္းထုတ္ျပန္ေရး အဖြဲ႕က ဦးဥာဏ္ထြန္းကို ေမးတယ္။ ေဖာ့စဖါ့ရပ္ မပါဘူးလို႔ ျငင္းပါတယ္။ ဆရာ့ သံုးသပ္ခ်က္အရ ဒီမီးေလာင္ ဒဏ္ရာဟာ အပူခ်ိန္ ၁၆ဝ နဲ႔ ၂ဝဝ ဒီဂရီ ဝန္းက်င္ၾကားမွာ အေလာင္ကြ်မ္း ခံရတယ္လို႔ ေကာက္ခ်က္ခ်လို႔ ရပါသလား။
DTS: အမွန္က FIR ဖြင့္ရမယ္။ ကြ်မ္းက်င္သူေတြက စစ္ရမယ္။ Forensic experts ေတြလိုမယ္။ ပညာပိုင္းအလုပ္လဲပါတယ္။ တရားဥပေဒ နဲ႔ ႏိုင္ငံေရးနဲ႔ မရေသးဘူး။